Chess Forum
legalserv.com << online chess - < chess - chess > - chess online >>
| From | Message |
| Posted by stripper legalserv.com 4/17/2008 11:52:16 Play online chess |  Subject: Not respondingMessage: |
| Posted by chessnovice legalserv.com 4/17/2008 13:11:38 Play online chess | ... Message: |
| Posted by ccmcacollister legalserv.com 4/17/2008 15:21:03 Play online chess | Yes ... Message: |
| Posted by schnarre legalserv.com 4/17/2008 20:47:39 Play online chess | Message: |
| Posted by ketchuplover legalserv.com 4/18/2008 03:25:45 Play online chess | Message: |
Chess news: Vietnamese surprise in Moscow -- The Aeroflot Open, arguably the strongest open chess tournament ever, ended Feb. 19 in Moscow. The field of 80 included 75 chess grandmasters. The surprising winner of 21,000 Euros (about $28,000) for first place was 18-year-old Le Quang Liem of Vietnam, who scored an undefeated 7-2. His success followed his tie for first place in the Moscow Open, another GM-heavy chess tournament, a day before the start of the Aeroflot Open. Entering the last round of the Aeroflot Open, Le shared the lead with his countryman Nguyen Ngoc Truong Son, 19. Le defeated 2009 winner Ian Nepomniachtchi (Russia), while Nguyen lost to GM Anton Korobov (Ukraine), who took ... The f-pawn, part 3: a blunt but effective attack? -- Punting the f-pawn down the chess board may be desperate but it sometimes gets results. The Grand Prix Attack. White has just offered the f-pawn. How should Black reply? RB We've been using the metaphor of route-one football in our survey of the f-pawn advance, and while we all know from experience that the long, hopeful punt down the park can produce the occasional goal, this looks to me just a little too early and a little too crude. The team is barely on the pitch and the ball has already been booted up the other end. On principle alone it seems wrong. I can't decide whether Black's best response is 1…exf5 or simply to continue with ... Chess notes -- In a review of Diego Rasskin-Gutman’s book “Chess Metaphors’’ (MIT Press), which deserves special attention by chess lovers, former world chess champion Garry Kasparov has published in The New York Review of Books a retrospective look at the development of chess machines. He also expresses a hope for the future. It is strange to this column that Kasparov ever thought that he would be a worthy opponent of chess computers. The computers have so many advantages over human beings in playing chess that it is hardly a fair fight. The chess computer memory is simply a copying device, the machine can look at any number of books on chess openings, and ... | |